Effects of Climatic Changes Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Effects of Climatic Changes - Essay Example These gases in turn deplete the ozone layer and the green house hence leads to climatic change. This paper will explain in depth why there is much effect on developed countries by climate change compared to developing countries. This will be done by presentation of points of view and summarizing by picking on the best. Climatic changes Global warming is one of the greatest hazards facing the universe today. This heat from global warming cause’s oceans and atmosphere to heat up, and leads to changes in climate that poses a great threat to the universe (World Resources Institute (WRI), 2000). Global warming is majorly triggered by activities carried out by man, for instance burning of charcoal. Scientists have forecast global warming that will be accompanied adverse effects. The warming cause’s deaths from extreme cold and hot conditions, extreme weather as drought and floods, pathogens spread to other areas of a new invasion, changes in yields of agriculture, erosion, gl aciations and host many other effects. The effects will be of more harm to countries that are poverty stricken because of their locations, which hinder them from adaptation. However, one reason for not ignoring the changes due to its uncertainty is that it can be mitigated. Victims from global warming effects can also be helped out by aiding them to adapt to the changes. It is illogical to wait for solutions from methods of science provided that the harm is to extend to other areas. Only Americans are still in doubt of global warming and its aftermath and prevention of the act. The delays brought by debates in the US are projected to be of great harm as a result of suffering and hardship. Industrialized countries are believed to have greatly contributed to effects of global warming like changes in temperature and hindering ways of dealing with them (World Resources Institute (WRI), 2000). Currently, the emission of carbon dioxide that mainly emanates from coal burning, oil, and foss il fuels are from these industries. All the responsibility is borne by the U.S.A. They are the major emitters of the gases produced by the green house. In contradiction, the emission of these gases by countries stricken by poverty is from consumption of essential goods and services. Therefore, U.S.A. should wholly responsible for the eradication of this hazard in the globe as a whole. Treaties have been signed by nations on climate change. However, they acted less compared to the extent of the crisis to act out on them. In 1992, a framework was put in place to ensure that the levels of gaseous emissions reduced. However, most countries never adhered to it. In particular, the United States went against that by increment of their levels of emissions. However, the poverty-stricken countries were politely advised to minimize their levels of emissions as they were surpassing the primary source. Arguments arose that cuts were to be imposed on both developing and developed countries. The d eveloped states were to be exposed to big cuts in relation to rights to emitting of gases while the poor states were to be exposed to increases on these cuts. On the other hand, a practical argument was that, the same per capita should be entitled to emission of gases trading and shifting to sources that can be renewed (World Resources Institute (WRI), 2000). In general, these emissions have profound effects on the United States. The big question is if the powerful United States will accept to change their ways of living. To them